Guest Post: Things Need to Change by Matthew Catlett

Here it is, after 5 on a Monday afternoon and I am sitting at my desk trying to envision what I will teach my students tomorrow and becoming more and more frustrated with that picture. A little background: I have worked in education since 2008 in the capacity of a Sign Language Interpreter and now as a Deaf Ed/ASL-as-a-foreign-language teacher. The Deaf and Hard of Hearing students I work with average about a 4th grade reading level and my job is to prepare them for the “real world” through the mediums of Social Studies and Language Arts. These students are years behind their hearing peers which is frustrating enough (for them as well as for me) without me, as a teacher, being required to gear all of my teaching toward a test that they and I both know they will never pass… A test that has no bearing upon their lives or their futures. Case in point: I will begin teaching about the Progressive Era tomorrow. I absolutely agree that my students should know about the progressive movements of the early 1900s and I could have a blast teaching them about how these movements affect their lives today. We could look into the gruesome aspects of child labor, discuss the fascinating idea that prohibition was actually upheld in this country for a short period of time, and imagine the life of a regular worker working 12 or 15 hour days to support his family before the government began to regulate business. But… Oh wait, that’s what I did last unit when I took the time to compare and contrast the Jim Crow Laws, segregation, and discrimination with what’s going on today in Ferguson, MO and other places around the world. We actually took time to see how some things have changed for the positive while others have stayed the same. My students learned more pertinent information during those discussions than in any of the many lectures I’ve given that were trying to prepare them for a test. So what is the con here? Oh… I’m behind now. At least, behind where a group of lawmakers think I need to be. In my opinion, I am right where my students need me to be. Can I hurry it up to make sure they have everything they need from US History by the end of the semester (with emphasis on the word need)? Absolutely and I will! And they will still fail the test in April because what they need and what the testers believe my kids need are vastly different things. When will my discernment as a teacher be valued? I have watched students who I have formed a professional relationship with and care about sit down to take a test that another teacher in my situation did her best to prepare them for. I have watched as they began navigating through each question and the hope in their eyes died as they realized that this was just one more test they would fail. These were not subjects I had taught (all of my classes were non-EOI last year) but I will be watching these same students take tests about the subjects I have been commissioned with preparing them for this year. I am bracing myself for the moment when they look up, some with tears in their eyes, and say, “I’m going to have to take this test again next year to graduate, right?” Why? Because I refuse to devalue them by teaching them dates and names and particular pieces of information that will be gone the moment they leave my classroom. I choose instead to teach the things about life that will leave an impression on their memories for years to come and allow them to have the opportunities they deserve. I choose to teach them, for instance, that there have been two great wars in the World, why and where they happened, who was involved, and how they can help prevent a disastrous calamity of the same proportion by the attitudes they hold and the values they instill. I will teach them these things so that they can hold a viable conversation with other adults when this topic arises. In contrast, I will not take the time to teach them “which third-party candidate split the Republican Party in 1912 and prevented the reelection of President Taft.” Why? Because it holds no bearing on their lives. That question is ridiculous! And yet it is on the pre-test for Unit 2 of US History. So why don’t I just give up? Deaf and Hard of Hearing kids are on IEPs and can easily be switched to “portfolios” where they can do activities like draw lines from a word to a picture and receive a passing grade that way. Why do I only have one student taking an OAAP? Because I refuse to degrade a student who is a top football player or a student who is a highly respected basketball player on Edison’s athletics teams by presenting them with this option. I refuse to treat my students as though they have severe cognitive disabilities because they have missed out on communication at home and struggle with English and all of the intricacies involved with it. These are students who attend leadership conferences, have a high social life within their community (the Deaf community) and can do anything you ask them to do until they sit down to take a 2-3 hour test. At one time we had a modified version that these kids could pass while I taught them all of the things they are missing about the world around them – the things that the world around them learns just through listening. But not anymore. When is enough, enough?? How can I, as a 2nd year teacher who came in with the idea that I was going to change these kids’ worlds, already be burnt out to the point of considering another profession? When will we stand up and say, “I’m the teacher! I’m the one in the classroom every day! I see what my kids need so let me address those needs!” I believe the time is now.

From Guest Blogger Lea Nance

As a teacher, I come to each new school year with passion, excitement and a list of goals that I have for myself and my classroom. My first and most important goal is to find out who my students are and what they already know. What ways do they learn best and what motivates them? What social skills do they have and how do they function within the classroom environment? How can I help them be their very best in my class and succeed in the future? These are all things best determined by engaging them in conversation and planning lessons that show you their current skills while allowing you to observe them. You see, each child is different and each classroom is different. Autonomous teachers know why they do what they do with the children in their classroom. They know why what works for one student doesn't work for another and with that, they have the ability to find what does work for each and every student. They know that a script cannot take into account the backgrounds, social and emotional needs of the children they teach. They can justify their plans using what they've been taught as teachers and the data they've gathered from their students. Autonomous teachers take responsibility for what the students are learning. Autonomous teachers are passionate about teaching because they are learners themselves in the process. Autonomous teachers are always able to challenge themselves and grow because they are constantly researching and adapting the ways in which to improve their teaching to better meet the needs of their students. Giving the teacher the autonomy and the power to do what they are qualified to do is what ensures they bring the passion every year. As a teacher I have watched the autonomy of classrooms be taken away more and more and not only do I feel the frustrations when planning my lessons, I see the frustration and the burdens in the children I teach. Mandating scripted curriculum, which is a practice not grounded in research, ensures that teachers have no voice and students have little to no interest. Teachers are rewarded one year for their success and growth in using a program in the way that best benefits their class, and the next year they are told they can no longer do it that way. Mandating assessments that do not truly reflect the work and the knowledge of the children is holding back both teachers and students by limiting valuable teaching time. As a teacher I spend countless hours coming up with ways to meet all the needs of my students and I watch year after year as more of the time I need to do that is taken away from me and replaced with curriculum and assessments that do not meet their needs. Teachers have long understood what is developmentally appropriate for the children they teach. Highly qualified teachers know exactly what, how and when to teach the concepts that their students need and in the best ways for their students. It is not enough to have a highly qualified teacher in each classroom if you are not allowing them to do what they are qualified to do. When you take away my autonomy you take away my power, but most importantly you risk diminishing my passion.

Welcome to the Limb

An Open Letter of Support for Two Brave Teachers As the President of TCTA, I spend a lot of time out on the proverbial limb. It’s my job; I believe it’s my calling to speak truth to power and to advocate for public schools and the teaching profession as a whole; and for my members in particular. Sometimes it gets lonely out on that limb. I don’t have an administrator or an ILD micromanaging me into helplessness and threatening my job on a daily basis. That is the daily reality for many of my members so they don’t have the freedom to speak up and speak out. Then along come practices that just aren’t good for kids and teachers do what they do best – they advocate for their students. They sound the alarm and say, “This just isn’t right” and they make a stand, in spite of the threats to their own jobs. My members, Nikki Coates-Jones and Karen Hendren, are speaking out on a national level against toxic testing and “accountability” measures which take away precious instructional time from our classrooms. They are passionate about teaching and are deeply committed to their own students and to all students whose experiences in school have become dry and joyless due to constant test preparation and data mining. These ladies are widely recognized as highly effective teachers and these highly-effective teachers have had enough. They are refusing to administer the MAP test and student surveys to their first-graders. They are part of the United Opt-Out movement and they are courageously speaking on behalf of students and teachers who have suffered in silence for too long. I give them my full support and encouragement and I will be with them as they take this path. Welcome to the limb, my friends. It’s good to have company. Patti Ferguson-Palmer President, Tulsa Classroom Teachers Association Member, NEA Board of Directors

No Money for That

I spoke at the Tulsa School Board meeting tonight on the three proposed new charter schools. I watched their presentation two weeks ago and I’ve read their proposals and they are extremely impressive. Charter schools and teachers unions have had some difficulties trying to figure out how to co-exist. I even heard that a new administrator to the district made the comment, “I don’t know anything about TCTA except that they hate charter schools.” Well, there is a lot more to know about TCTA and I’ve been studying everything I can about charter schools. The National Education Association, of which TCTA, is a local affiliate states in their policy on charter schools: “Charter schools have the potential to impact positively, or negatively, on public education -- and this in turn will depend on how such schools are designed and operated.” I believe the proposed new charters have been designed, and will be operated, to have a positive impact on some of the students of Tulsa Public Schools. You have the resources and support to ensure success and we wish you nothing but the greatest success. Our fight is not with you. Our fight is with a system which is inherently unequal. The traditional schools in TPS have had funding cut to the bone and when we suggest a remedy for a problem, we are told, “There’s no money for that.” Charters are touted for their autonomy and flexibility with extended school days, extended school years, and a month’s worth of professional development for teachers. When TCTA has expressed our willingness to do the same, we’ve been told “There’s no money for that.” Our bargained contract is seen as an impediment to progress because we expect people to be paid for the work they do. Who, in this room, would be willing to do their job for free? That’s called volunteering and it doesn’t pay the bills. Because of the collaborative relationship TCTA has enjoyed with TPS over the last few years, we expected meetings and discussions and compromising on such issues. Imagine our surprise when we found out from the publishing of a board agenda that 1. This is happening; 2. This is happening right now; 3. They don’t care what TCTA thinks. The charter proposals state there will be an “emphasis on teacher retention.” If you find the answer to that, will you share it with the Human Capital department at TPS? Data from the National Center for Education statistics found that 25% of charter school teachers turned over during the 03-04 school year, compared to 14% of traditional public school teachers. Using “multi-nomial logistic regression,” they found the odds of a charter school teacher leaving the profession versus staying in the same school are 132% greater than those of a traditional public school teacher. Our students deserve the most career-committed teachers possible but when we ask for an increase in teacher pay in order to stop the exodus we’re told, “There’s no money for that.” So I look forward to learning how the retention problem has been solved. The proposed charters promise teacher to student ratios of as small as 13:1. When we ask for smaller class sizes we’re told either, “There’s no money for that” or “Class size doesn’t matter; good teaching is good teaching.” College Bound Academy will have a TA in every kindergarten classroom. When we ask for additional TAs, we’re told, “There’s no money for that.” Tulsa Honor Academy will have a Dean of Students. When we asked for a Dean in every elementary school, we were told, “There’s no money for that.” Obviously the recurring theme here is “There’s no money for that” but funding isn’t the only difference we see. The charters offer a “warm/strict environment” with a “strong discipline code.” Classroom Management is the indicator most often identified as a source of weakness on the TLE and most often leads to the “exiting” of teachers. Will the successful solution of the discipline problem be shared with the traditional TPS schools? The charters will hold expectations for parents/families to be part of their student’s educational success but when students or their families fail to “meet the expectations,” will they be counseled to return to their neighborhood schools? In the traditional schools, when students don’t “meet the expectations,” the teacher is often blamed and then it is reflected on their TLE. We appreciate that the students for the charters will be chosen by lottery, as that is a fair system. But the traditional schools will still be teaching all of the students who don’t win the lottery and will be doing so without the resources and support being offered to the charters because “there’s no money for that.” The story of TPS has become a story of double standards where some players are dealt a better hand than others. We wish the charters success, but even more, we wish success to ALL of the students of Tulsa Public Schools and they deserve to be treated with equity and on a level playing field. When the deck is stacked in favor of the charter schools, with small class sizes and expectations and requirements for parents, they are guaranteed a victory. A true victory would come from investing in EVERY student in EVERY classroom in EVERY building, but we already know: There’s no money for that.

73 Is Too Hot

OK, I'm just gonna put this out there because I'm extremely frustrated and disappointed. Classrooms in TPS have their thermostats universally set at 73 during warm/hot weather because the district is part of an energy savings initiative. I get that. However, I've heard from many teachers whose classrooms are uncomfortably hot (especially with 30 - 40 warm bodies in them). Last week and this week, heat indexes have ranged from 90 to 109. I sent a letter to the people in charge, asking that on days when the heat index is over 90, that thermostats be set at 70 and they not be turned off until 6:00 p.m. (Contrary to popular belief, many teachers stay and work in their classrooms after the students are gone.) I sent a chart showing that this range of heat indexes is dangerous to children and teachers alike. I stressed that the safety and learning conditions should be a higher priority than saving money. The lone response I got was to argue that "lowering temperatures increases humidity." I'm no scientist but I've lived in Oklahoma my whole life so I'm pretty sure I know about heat and humidity. After fighting this battle for an entire day, I happened to be in an administrative conference room at the Education Service Center where the thermostat was set at a frosty 70 degrees. I posted pictures and shared them here on Facebook and on Twitter. No response from the people who have the power to change the policy. The most important point I'm trying to make is that kids and teachers are getting sick from the heat and I don't know how much learning can take place when children are in that much discomfort. Many classrooms in TPS are showing temperatures above 80. The second point is that VIPs should be abiding by the same energy guidelines as teachers, students, principals, and support workers. This isn't Pre-Revolutionary France. My third point is that I am a voting citizen in Tulsa, a former student of TPS, a former parent of TPS, a former teacher in TPS, and I have the great honor and privilege of speaking for the teachers in TPS. The voice of the teachers and students is being ignored. Parents of TPS, You need to speak up for your children. They deserve better.

#Ask The Teachers

I first became a part of Tulsa Public Schools in 1967 when I was a proud kindergartner at MacArthur and I’m convinced I had the most inspiring teachers in the world there and at Whitney and Hale. I grew up in a time when teachers were like gods; even my parents were afraid of them. Society held teachers on a pedestal. The teacher was always right and you’d better not get in trouble at school because you’d be in twice as much trouble at home. The boundaries of each elementary school were a small town and it was pointless to try to hide anything from your parents because they’d hear it anyway at the beauty shop or Sipes Food Barn or the Rotary Club. That was a long time ago and everything in the world has changed. Sometime in the 35 years since I graduated from high school, teachers fell off the pedestal. An entire profession began to be blamed for, not only every individual teacher who wasn’t up to snuff, but for all of the ills of society. Teacher-bashing became a national sport. And how did teachers respond? We took it. We internalized the things they said about us and accepted it because really, really smart, and really, really rich people said it and we were just poor schmucks making $30,000 a year so the smart and rich guys must be right. But they’re wrong. Teachers are working harder and longer than they ever have and are constantly held up to public scrutiny and being told what to do by “experts” with less experience in the classroom than they have. Everyone is looking for a way to “fix the problem” and no one is asking the true experts. If everyone on an airplane got sick and I had to land the plane, I wouldn’t call a heart surgeon to ask how to do it. I’d ask a pilot. If all of the water pipes in my home burst, I wouldn’t ask an accountant for help; I’d ask a plumber. If we want to know why certain things are happening in the public schools, we don’t ask the guy who invented the Slinky; we ask a teacher. How do kids learn best? Ask the teachers. What’s the best way to teach a child how to read? Ask the teachers. Why is there a teacher shortage? Ask the teachers. When the whole country is trying to figure out what’s best for kids, ask the people who know the names of those kids. Ask the people who know their favorites and their fears. Ask the people who stockpile packaged cheese crackers in their filing cabinets and pool their resources to make sure a student can buy a graduation gown or have a Christmas or a Thanksgiving dinner. Ask the people who already live paycheck to paycheck but can’t stand for their students to do without. Ask the teachers. Ask the teachers who are proven and committed; not just the shiny and new. Ask the teachers who laugh with them and cry with them and mourn them and celebrate with them and wear them home like a bruise. And when you’ve finally asked the teachers, let them answer. Listen. /// Just listen. And then don’t kill the messenger. When a teacher has the courage to rise and speak truth to power, to say, “No, Mr. Emperor, you’re not wearing nice new clothes.” Don’t get angry. Sit down and talk about how you’re going to solve the problem together. Collaboration doesn’t mean you telling me what you’re going to do whether I like it or not. Relationship-building doesn’t mean hurling directives at people. Climate and culture are everything. Our educators’ working conditions are our students’ learning conditions. Trust and respect have to be more than words that get applause lines in a speech. They have to grow out of a dialogue between those who know and love the students and those who have the power and means to make decisions for and about those students. Ask the teachers. Listen with your whole being. Then let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work together with a shared purpose: a great PUBLIC school for every student. Put teachers back on that pedestal and people will be fighting to get up there. How do I know that’s true? Ask the teachers.

Post from a Guest Blogger

The following was written by Emily Monroe Wade, a Special Education teacher and my former student. She deserves an audience. And that's what I really think. It’s the month of April again. For some people it means beautiful weather and new beginnings. April fills me with nothing more than dread. Dread because I have to completely put the thing that I love doing everyday on hold for a month only to do something that I loathe. A job that is required of me for reasons I still have yet to figure out. It’s a job that may hold my career at stake; it’s a job that may hold my school at stake. This month- long job has expectations. In some cases, these expectations are to perform miracles. Other expectations require hoop jumping, lion taming, trapeze swinging and other circus -related metaphors. This job is state testing. I have been teaching for 11 years. State testing has been the old reliable constant these 11 years in a field that is constantly changing. These changes are made in an effort to find better ways to reach kids and give them their best chance at a good life which is one reason I am curious as to why testing hasn’t evolved. There is one change I have noticed and that is that every year it seems to get worse. This year has been especially brutal due to over-crowding, which has resulted in higher numbers of special education and English language learners. It has also been painful because of the implementation of the new 3rd grade retention law. This is a law that was so brilliantly thought up by state legislators and a state superintendent that know very little about education. I could go on forever about this one, but I will spare you a little for now. Stay tuned. There is so much work involved in administering state tests that in my building it takes two reading specialists, two language arts assistants, and two special education teachers and the Gifted and Talented teacher to get everything ready. Those six people could actually use the assistance of the ELL teacher and her assistant, too, if she were available to help but unfortunately they spend an entire month before regular state testing giving language proficiency tests to the 350 or more ELL students. The tests arrive in cardboard boxes of test booklets and answer sheets. There is about 400-450 of them, maybe more, because 3rd and 4th graders take two tests and 5th graders take four. These items need to be labeled with both handwritten and sticker labels, sorted, stacked, checked and sorted again. It takes days to get them ready. This year, this has had to be done with the regular scored test and a field test that has to be given toward the end of the testing window. The format with the field test is completely different from the regular required test that it too takes hours of preparation. The other major thing that has to be done is scheduling. This is a grueling process that requires solving a very complicated puzzle. That is because the Special Education and the ELL schedules must be done in addition to the regular classroom schedules. The special education and ELL schedules take hours of planning. Between both programs there are about 70 kids who test outside the regular classroom. This is because the students in these programs get special accommodations to the test in an effort to make them more successful, but not every child gets the same accommodation. The main thing that must be taken into account when we do the schedule is that each group being given the test can be no larger than 5 students. Each of the 5 students in the group must also have the same accommodations aside from the small group. Plus the 5 kids per group take multiple tests depending on what grade they are in. We have some kids that require individual testing as well. Also, no kid can take two tests twice in one day. It should be easy if we are given an entire month, however, if we are sticking with the circus metaphor then the “testing window” is much more like a clown car for the special education and ELL teachers. In order to meet all the needs of our students and give them their best chance of passing we must cram as many testing sessions as possible during the days we are allowed to give tests. Perhaps one upside that could possibly be taken away from the scheduling process is that it involves so much critical thinking that hopefully it will keep our minds sharp up into old age. During testing the testing coordinator and players feel much like they are in a circus, too. The testing coordinator, who in our case is one of the reading specialists, is running around finding people to monitor the teachers administering the tests, dealing with paperwork, putting out fires such as absences or new students starting school within the testing window. What else says “Welcome to your new school” more than giving a state mandated test? The special education and ELL teachers are trying to round up the students they are testing that session because they sometimes wind up all over the building. This is because of miscommunication or a mistake on the schedule. Did I forget to mention that in addition to coming up with a special education and ELL testing schedule, we also have to come up with a special education and ELL NOT-testing schedule? That is because we have to find somewhere for the kids not testing with their class and not currently testing with one of us somewhere to go. On some days that is up to 55 kids we have to find a temporary placement for. If the ELL teachers, the special education teachers, and reading specialists are completely incapacitated for a whole month that means that kids who need services from those specialists are not getting them. For some kids, that could be an amount of time for a whole reading level worth of growth with proper instruction. This month without services is especially a conundrum for a special education student who needs access to education modifications and practices that may result in performing better on the test that he or she is unfairly forced to take. Why must we go through all of this? What is actually accomplished with testing? It doesn’t make the students better people. It doesn’t really measure what they know, but really it’s what they don’t know. It puts a limit on something that should be limitless. I may have misspoken up in one of the earlier paragraphs about the changing of testing. Some changes are coming down the pike, but honestly it is more of the same. What is measured and how the test is formatted is going to change but the expectations will be the same, especially the expectations that come with the new 3rd grade retention law. This law states that EVERY child should be able to pass the test regardless of ability. In many circumstances it is asking a child to perform a miracle. How can a child with a learning disability who has a learning rate much lower than the average 3rd grader suddenly triple his or her learning rate in time to pass the 3rd grade test? The evolution I and many other career educators would like to see take place with testing is a personalized approach. Let’s start comparing children to themselves instead of trying to fit children in this little box. Isn’t that the opposite of what we want for them in life? Let’s celebrate little Johnny starting the year recognizing 50 words and ending the year knowing 300. Let’s praise little Sophie’s teacher for helping her go from a level D reading level to a level I in the span of a school year.* Let’s stop wasting valuable time and school personnel on something that does not contribute to the educational growth of a child. *Our district uses a alphabetic letter system for assigning a reading level to a student which is modeled after Fountas and Pinnell.